About

Like this:

Be the first to like this page.

32 Responses to “About”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address

1 akuskis on June 5, 2010 said:

Next year, 2011, is the centenary of Marshall McLuhan’s birth on July 21. This blog is intended to detail the events of the coming centenary year, to track the increasing recognition of McLuhan’s ideas and relevance in our Internet Age, and to detail my own explorations of his work and legacy.

Dr. Alex Kuskis was born in Czechoslovakia of Latvian parents and immigrated to Canada at the age of 4. He has divided his career equally between education and business. Holding a BA in English from the University of Western Ontario, and an MA in Dramatic Literature & Theatre History from the University of Toronto, more recently he completed MEd and PhD degrees in Educational Computing & Online Learning at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE), University of Toronto. He has held management positions in book publishing for such firms as Penguin, Holt, Rinehart & Winston & John Wiley, as well as IT and computer training companies. With teaching stints at the Universities of Toronto, Manitoba (where he also directed student theatre) and Wilfrid Laurier University, he has taught online for Connected University and Royal Roads University. He has also held academic administration positions at DeVry Institute of Technology, the Institute for Computer Studies, and the University of Guelph. Now preferring to teach courses online, he occasionally accepts assignments as an e-learning consultant. He presently teaches online communication theory and media studies courses for Gonzaga University’s MA Program in Communication & Leadership. See http://tinyurl.com/625mf3p .

His academic interests include media ecology, Marshall McLuhan, Neil Postman, online learning, communication theory & history, and Internet studies. He is currently writing a book on McLuhan’s ideas on education, co-authored by Robert Logan.

Reply
- 2 Debbie Ponsaran on January 17, 2012 said:
  
  Thank you so much for this excellent blog… really very informative.
  
  Reply
3 Tracy Conway on November 5, 2010 said:

I get a lot out of this blog, so thank you for compiling these articles and hosting this.

Reply
4 Keith Spillett on November 21, 2010 said:

I am REALLY excited that there is a blog dedicated to McLuhan. I plan on reading everything on here!!! Thanks for keeping the works and ideas of McLuhan alive and available to people.

Reply
5 Dr. Dampier Whetterbottom on January 5, 2011 said:

I have just been made aware of this blog by my collegue
Dr. Zoot Horn Rollo …

just wsnted to say this is THE BEST BLOG IN THE UNIVERSE !

You are obviously a GENIUS of stupendous proportions !

I would gladly pay a subscription fee to have access to
your talents but it is free ! i WILL TELL MY FRIENDS !

Kee[ up the good work !

Sincerely

Dr. Dampier Whetterbottom
Department of Communications
Sheffield University

Reply
6 Prof. Li Wan Wu on January 6, 2011 said:

Fine understanding of medias are had on every web pag !

You must be first of class media ecologist because you so smart
and ahead in understanding of everybody in your worlds.

We desire your skills to help set up our new programs
in media/comunication study.

Great movements on the blog !

Professor Li Wan Wu
Institute of Media Study
Peking University,
No.5 Yiheyuan Road Haidian District,
Beijing, P.R.China 100871
http://www.pku.edu.cn/

Reply
- 7 akuskis on January 26, 2011 said:
  
  Dr. Wu, I have worked as an e-learning consultant and would be willing to assist you in establishing your new program. You can email me at alex.kuskis@utoronto.ca . Thank you………..Alex
  
  Reply
8 Dr. Praveer S. Patel on January 14, 2011 said:

Dear Blogmaster,

Your blog is quite the service and does great wook for the world of
researchers and mediums. Thank you for all the times you take to put it
into a web of messages to McLuhan interests.

All of my colleageues here have been pouring over your wook
for many days and we certainly think you are a man of the world
going up and down and around in it.

Impressive is the word I say it is ! Please make it so more !

Kind Regards,

Dr. Praveer S. Patel
Research Chair
Mumbai Institute of Media Studies
Mumbai, India

Reply
9 Dr. Hu S. Bohng on January 19, 2011 said:

Happy Birhtday !

New here to web and know not so much about McLuhan …
are you related to him ?

Is he astronomist or why all the mentions of galaxy ?
Very nice space you have for him.
I have a Yahoo account so I will await you return.
Nice gray background … Strong presentation of blog linkage.

Sincerely,

Dr. Hu [Sip] Bohng
Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research
KIMEP
2 Abay Ave., Office 209
Almaty 050010
Republic of Kazakhstan

Reply
10 Dr. Hu S. Bohng on January 19, 2011 said:

forgotask … probe is a what ?
Is it like grip on a rope of a stick … sorry
for type here.

Reply
- 11 akuskis on January 26, 2011 said:
  
  Definition of a probe by Eric MacLuhan/William Kuhns: “The probe is a means or method of perceiving. It comes from the world of conversation and dialogue as much as from poetics and literary criticism. Like conversation, the verbal probe is discontinuous, nonlinear; it tackles things from many angles at once.”
  - Book of Probes (2003), p. 403.
  
  Reply
12 Dr. J. Bruce Wrotten on January 20, 2011 said:

so good to see someone who knows what they are doing …

Dr. J. B. Wrotten
Department of Philosophy
University of Wallamaloo
Queensland, Australia

Reply
13 Dr. Rebop Kwakubah on January 26, 2011 said:

Is it true MM looked down on all non white peoples
and was extremely homophobic …

Why the admiration can you tell me please ?

Dr. Rebop Kwakubah
Race, Gender + Media Studies
London School of Economics

Reply
- 14 akuskis on January 26, 2011 said:
  
  No, there is no truth in that comment whatsoever. Where did you hear such nonsense?……..Alex
  
  Reply
15 Professor Hafdís Vilborg Jóhannsdóttir on January 26, 2011 said:

I think his homophobia comes from his time at Cambridge … he suspected everyone was either “a homo or a commie” … as for non whites … he does seem to refer to them as ‘primitives’ alot …

Professor Hafdís Vilborg Jóhannsdóttir
Cultural Studies
The University of Akureyri
Nordurslod 2
600 Akureyri, Iceland

Reply
- 16 akuskis on January 26, 2011 said:
  
  Yes, that’s true. Cambridge in the 1930s was rife with both homosexuals and and communists. However, possibly more important was his early upbringing in 2 of Canada’s most conservative provinces, Alberta, where he was born, and Manitoba, where he grew up and attended the University of Manitoba. A person’s early upbringing forms the character more than the later university years. His dislike of both homosexuals and communists is also consistent with his conversion to Catholicism in 1937. As for persons of color, Canada in the 1930s to 1960s was a very white country; I doubt if he had experienced much interaction with colored people, so had little knowledge of them. But, I wouldn’t call him a racist…….Alex
  
  Reply
17 Professor Jacques Duhamel on January 31, 2011 said:

>But, I wouldn’t call him a racist…….Alex

“The Negro is turned on by electricity.
The old literacy never turned him on
because it rejected and degraded
the Negro, but electricity turns him
on and accepts him totally as
an integral human being.”

Professor Jacques Duhamel
Center for Media Studies
Duke University

Reply
- 18 akuskis on January 31, 2011 said:
  
  I see nothing racist in that. Seemingly you do. We disagree. In any case it’s a minor comment in an extensive body of influential work that is not worth blowing out of proportion. I know plenty of people who knew the man personally, along with critics of his work, and nobody I’m aware of has ever seen elements of racism in his work…….Alex
  
  Reply
19 Mark Stahlman on February 1, 2011 said:

Alex:

As you know, McLuhan was “religious” about keeping his own personal views out of his public affairs. Selecting a quote and trying to ascribe it to him personally is a fundamental error. In fact, McLuhan’s extraordinary efforts to not “take sides” in the various conflicts of the late 60′s probably set him up for the sharp decline in interest in his work in the 70′s.

That decline was accelerated by the character assassination penned by Jonathan Miller in 1971, which highlighted McLuhan’s Catholicism. Miller was a member the Cambridge Apostle’s secret society, which incidentally had more than its share of homosexuals and communists.

Racism, in particular, does not fit with his Catholicism. As an actively universal church, Catholics span the globe, in every culture and with members in every race. Racism — prejudice based on racial background — makes no sense for a Catholic.

Obviously, comments about “primitives,” referencing dominant media and cultural patterns, isn’t speaking about race. McLuhan was quite aware that a return of “orality” (i.e. culture caused by electric media) meant a return of paganism and that the neo-Pagans would very likely be racially white. His whole discussion of the “Global Village” (and much more) was built on the recognition that primitive behaviors showed no racial affinity.

Mark Stahlman
Brooklyn NY

Reply
- 20 akuskis on February 1, 2011 said:
  
  Mark,
  Thank you for those astute comments, which are – er, pardon the pun, on the mark. Indeed, Catholicism is incompatible with racist views. I teach online communication courses part-time for a Jesuit university in the U.S. that is not only non-racist, but also indulgent about other religions, as well as non-religion. It employs Buddhists, Jews, people of other Christian faiths, as well as atheists and agnostics. However, let’s remember that McLuhan wasn’t born a Catholic, but converted to it in 1937 at the age of 26; he called it entering by the back door of the Church, rather than the front door. He was exposed to Catholic thinking at Cambridge in the 1930s, where, instead of following the fashionable cult of communism among students, he became an ardent follower of G.K. Chesterton and other Catholic writers. Anyone interested in McLuhan’s conversion to Catholicism should listen to the following audio clip, made available by the National Library & Archives of Canada:
  http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/030003/f7/030003-002.wma .
  
  For what it’s worth, I once met Jonathan Miller at a Shakespeare academic conference and a more arrogant and condescending Brit I have never met. McLuhan himself was considered to be a hick from the colonies by some of his contemporaries at Cambridge; there is something of that colonial condescension in Miller’s put-down of his work. But, Miller will be forgotten, whereas McLuhan is increasingly remembered and acknowledged.”The whirligig of time brings its revenges”……Alex
  
  Reply
21 Mark Stahlman on February 1, 2011 said:

Alex:

Thanks for posting this audio clip — as usual, you need to listen to the end!

He says, “I was studying the Church as FORMAL CAUSE — its effects. But I wasn’t studying its effects on ME.”

Expanding on his “back door” metaphor, he explains the DOOR = Formal Cause and the KNOCK = prayer and then the effect that it had on him.

My guess is that nearly everyone who calls themselves a McLUHANITE (and, indeed, most of those who are gearing up for the celebrations this year) have no idea what Formal Cause even means. It simply never came up in their “modern” education.

And as a result, they truly “know nothing” of his work.

In particular, when he says “the medium is the message and the user is the content,” he is simply restating his own experience of conversion.

MEDIUM = FORMAL CAUSE (i.e. the Church is the “message”) and USER = EFFECT (i.e. his conversion is the “content”).

Fortunately, this year Eric McLuhan is publishing his book “Media and Formal Cause” along with another titled “Theories of Communication” — in which he’ll discuss the communication theory of Aquinas, one of his father’s key sources on Formal Causality. Both are mistakenly noted as published in 2009 on his website –

http://ericmcluhan.com/

Perhaps this will even lead some to ponder the impact of another key McLuhan phrase (also borrowed from Aquinas), the “analogy of proper proportionality”?

Mark Stahlman
Brooklyn NY

Reply
22 Paul Evitts on September 14, 2011 said:

We met tonite, at the Salon. I asked about the blog. It turns out I’ve been absorbing it for the last month or so. Great site. Many thanks!

Reply
- 23 Alex Kuskis on September 14, 2011 said:
  
  Thanks, Paul. I was pleased to meet you. I hope this blog is useful to you. I find it u
  seful for myself to be able to keep on top of things in the McLuhan world, as it relates to scholarship and the influence of his ideas…….AlexK
  
  Reply
24 robin tomens on December 3, 2011 said:

Hi
I’ve just posted an article by MM on my blog that you may want to look at.

http://includemeout2.blogspot.com/2011/12/reversal-of-overheated-image-marshall.html

Reply
25 MD on January 26, 2012 said:

Your blog on Alexander Bell begins “This article omits…” It would be helpful if you would kindly specify such references with proper citation data.

Reply
- 26 Alex Kuskis on January 26, 2012 said:
  
  Quite right. I got the quote from the City of Brantford’s (Ontario) homepage: http://tinyurl.com/crygoqm . I had no need to locate where they obtained that and similar quotations, as I have no reason to doubt their veracity….AlexK
  
  Reply
27 Alex Kuskis on January 29, 2012 said:

Thanks, Jessica, but I need to know which Jessica you are. I presently have 2 Jessicas in my COML 509 class. Your blog looks good. It wasn’t hard to set up, was it?……AlexK

Reply

About

Like this:

32 Responses to “About”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Blogroll

A Man for All Media

Email Subscription

RSS

From Marshall & Me – Michael Hinton’s Blog

Tags

Tweets

Follow “McLuhan Galaxy”