Redux Posting: Marshall McLuhan, Jane Jacobs & the Toronto Spadina Expressway: “Forget your ego.”
Aerial photo of the Hwy 401 & Spadina Expressway (Allen Road) Interchange, facing east (October, 1967)
Check your ego at the transit door
By Michael Geller – Vancouver Courier – March 3, 2015
My interest in the forthcoming transit referendum dates back, in part, to Oct. 15, 1970 when, as a University of Toronto student, I attended the premiere screening of a The Burning Would, a documentary film made by the late Jane Jacobs and Marshall McLuhan opposing a proposed expansion of Toronto’s Spadina Expressway.
Both Jacobs and McLuhan were supposed to be at the screening but McLuhan had to cancel at the last minute. The moderator apologized for his absence and read out his speech which, as I recall, comprised three words: “Forget your ego.” McLuhan wanted us to stop thinking about expressways and automobiles as first-class transportation and public transit as second-class.
The Spadina Expressway and how it ended the Golden Age of the Automobile
Jane Jacobs on “Making a Movie with Marshall McLuhan”
I first met Marshall McLuhan in 1969, when we had lunch together at the Faculty Club at the University of Toronto. I found him interesting and kind, but I hardly knew what to make of him as a thinker because of the way his conversation jumped about. He would say something interesting or outright brilliant which I would have liked to pursue with him and test out a little bit, but instead he would — flit — or so it seemed to me — to a different idea, and from that to still another.
But although this was bewildering and a little frustrating, I found the lunch enjoyable and knew that I’d met a really remarkable man. Then Colin Vaughan called up one day and brought McLuhan over to where I lived at the time on Spadina Road. They were concerned about a tract of land just south of Wychwood Park where they both lived, which was going to be developed into hideous highrise slabs. Colin Vaughan, who is an architect, had figured that the same number of people could be housed in a decent, human way. Marshall had become involved because he saw how horrid those slabs would be right on their border. We talked about how to fight it; of course I was on their side.
Sometime later Marshall got in touch with me again. In his wonderful energetic and optimistic way, he said:
“We need a movie about the Spadina Expressway! You and I can do the script.”
I said, “But I don’t know a thing about scriptwriting. I won’t be any use.”
“Oh, I’ve never written one either,” he said, “but we can easily do it together. Come on down to my office and we’ll get to work.”
I was dubious about this, but I was carried away by his enthusiasm. We really did need a movie about the issues involved. It was a good idea, so I went to his office in the Coach House, and McLuhan called in his secretary, introduced her, and said, “She’ll take down what we say.”
So we talked. Both of us were enthusiastic and much of our conversation consisted of “Hey, what about this?” followed by some notion, and “Hey what about this?” followed by another. After we had talked for about an hour, Marshall asked the secretary, “Have you got it all down?” Then he turned to me and said, “Well that’s it. We’ve got the script.”
“No we don’t!” I said “It’s all just ‘Hey, what about this?”
“Oh, that’s immaterial,” he replied.
He made a date for us to see the filmmaker, who was Christopher Chapman — the man who made “A Place to Stand.” When we arrived at his studio I was handed a typed copy of the script. I started looking through it, and it was even more garbled and unreadable than I expected. It was not the secretary who had garbled it — she had done an excellent job — it was just that what Marshall and I had said was so garbled. All the “Hey, what about this’s” were in there. The thing jumped around, without beginning or end. This did not bother Marshall but it did bother me. I thought we needed a thread.
Chapman also had a copy of the script in his hand, but to my mingled relief and alarm he didn’t seem exactly to read it. He flipped through it, back and forth, and said congenially that it was fine; it was something to go on. He asked us a lot of questions about the issues, Marshall went off and I remained a while longer to answer some more questions. That’s all I did.
Once in a while Marshall phoned and said everything was going fine, and in due course invited me to a viewing. I couldn’t have been more astonished that there even was a film. Marshall had obviously done lots more work on it. The name of the movie was “A Burning Would” The title was, of course, Marshall’s. [The title comes from a line in Finnegans Wake, “For a burning would is come to dance inane” (FW 250.16), which itself is an allusion to a line in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, “…and now a wood / Comes toward Dunsinane”.]
There was a shape to it. It had music. It did have a thread and raised a lot of important issues. Colin Vaughan provided an excellent narration. It was a good movie; furthermore, it was shown a lot, especially in the United States. For a long time I would get an occasional letter from this or that group in California saying that they had shown the movie. However, the final product bore no relationship at all to our original script.
That was my experience of writing a script with Marshall McLuhan. I’m still as bewildered about scriptwriting as I was when I began. It’s a mystery to me that something tangible, coherent and constructive could come out of that mess. I’m still bewildered about Marshall too. I used to think that if I had his brain, I’d go nuts, living with all those skittering thoughts not put into order – chaos and confusion. But of course, it wasn’t awful for him. He relished it. He was at peace with those dazzling sparks and fragments. He was not a disintegrated man, but the opposite. I saw that his brilliance swiftly opened up whole avenues of thought, even if you had some suspicions about them. Like our movie, Marshall really got somewhere.
(Source: https://tinyurl.com/y2d4rnzp)
See also Jane Jacobs’ comments in Nevitt, B. with McLuhan, M. (1995). Who Was Marshall McLuhan? Toronto: Stoddart, pp. 101-103.
See also “The Burning Would” (1970)- Marshall McLuhan’s documentary film at https://goo.gl/F1rY9E
Filed under: Academic, Articles, Commentary, Education, Films, Ideas, Media Events, Remembrance | 2 Comments
Tags: academic, articles, centenary, communication, culture, education, ideas, media ecology, Toronto, video
I cannot still believe why Google didn’t made a Doodle for 100 McLuhan’s birthday in 2011….
LikeLike
I agree, Paolo. Considering the names of some of the famous people who have been remembered in Google Doodles, the fact that they missed Marshall McLuhan’s birthday on July 21, 2011 is a surprising and unfortunate oversight: Andy Warhol, Albert Einstein, Leonardo da Vinci, Rabindranath Tagore, Louis Braille, Ella Fitzgerald, Percival Lowell, Edvard Munch, Nikola Tesla, Béla Bartók, René Magritte, Norman Hetherington, John Lennon, Michael Jackson, Vladimir Dakhno, Robert Moog, Akira Kurosawa, Satyajit Ray, H. G. Wells, Freddie Mercury, Samuel Morse, Hans Christian Ørsted, Mahatma Gandhi, Dennis Gabor, Édith Piaf, Constantin Brâncuși, Antonio Vivaldi, Abdel Halim Hafez, Jules Verne and Leonhard Euler, among over 9,000 others.See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Doodle. I didn’t think of it then, but am annoyed by it now………Alex
LikeLike